(REMARKS AS PREPARED)
Mr. Chairman, while it is clear we must act, we must ensure the
action we take actually stimulates the economy and lays the foundation
for real, sustained job creation in the private sector. Much of the
negotiations and deals I have heard and read about, which took place
behind closed doors and before this conference even convened, seem to
result in this legislation having less of a benefit for American
families now, when they need it the most.
Frankly, because this process has been so rushed, we are literally
flying blind. CBO has told us that both the House and Senate passed
versions would cost Americans their jobs and be a negative drag on our
economy over the next 10 years. Let me be clear: CBO says the burden
created by the additional debt payments and government crowd out of the
private market contained in this stimulus bill will cost Americans
their jobs in 2019.
While we know the negative impact in 2019, we have no data on the
impact – positive or negative – the “stimulus” package will have on our
economy just three years from now. Before we jump into this trillion
dollar plane we know crashes in 2019, we should know if it will crash
sooner.
I believe this conference, the Members of the House and Senate and
the American people deserve to know the full impact of this legislation
before we vote on it. To that end, I sincerely hope the House will
honor the vote we took yesterday giving Members -- and all Americans --
48 hours to digest the conference report and the deal you have struck.
Let me reiterate that I and every Republican in the House stand
ready to act. As you well know, we produced an alternative to both the
Senate and House versions that would create twice the jobs at half the
cost based on the data and methodology of the Chair of the President’s
Council of Economic Advisors.
As we move forward with this conference, it is my sincere wish that
we do so publicly and that we work in a bipartisan fashion to retain
those provisions that will have an immediate and positive impact on our
economy and ability to create and save jobs in this country. To that
end, I have 10 questions I think need to be answered:
1) There are several reports in press and even pronouncements by the
Senate Majority Leader and other Senators that indicate there is a deal
on stimulus. Can we see a copy?
2) How were some of the important differences between the House and Senate resolved with regard to:
• The Homebuyer Tax Credit
• COBRA subsidies
• Comparativeness Effectiveness Research
• Buy America
• AMT patch
• NOL carryback
• 3% government contract witholding
3) The President on Monday in Elkhart, IN, said that tax cuts for
working families are the most effective stimulus, but press reports
indicate the deal cuts billions from the Making Work Pay Credit. Why?
4) Yesterday, the House unanimously passed a motion to instruct
conferees that the bill text be made publically available on the
internet for 48 hours before a vote. Will you commit to ensuring this
is adhered to by declining to sign a conference report until the 48
hours have elapsed?
5) President Obama asked for a package that contained 40% in tax
cuts. What percent of the spending in this bill takes the form of tax
cuts? How much of those “tax cuts” are really outlays – transfers to
people who pay no taxes whatsoever, either payroll or income taxes?
6) Similarly, if this agreement passes, how many individuals will
receive transfers in excess of all taxes paid, including income and
payroll taxes?
7) How much of the cost of this bill is spending in 2009 and 2010, when our economy and American families really need it?
8) Larry Summers, the President’s Director of National Economic
Council, has argued that the stimulus should be “timely, temporary, and
targeted.” Does this bill contain any permanent increases in spending
in this bill or any other permanent provisions that do not comport with
the “temporary” standard?
9) As I mentioned above, both the Congressional Budget Office and
the Joint Committee on Taxation have estimated that the stimulus bills
passed by the House and Senate will, at some point in the coming decade
act as a drag on economic growth and employment compared to the
baseline estimate of no stimulus at all. Just so everyone understands
what this means: according to CBO and JCT in 10 years the economy will
be worse off with fewer jobs, less investment, and more unemployment by
passing this bill than if we do absolutely nothing. Do we have
year-to-year data from CBO and JCT to know whether the year-by-year
impact on our economy and if any long- and mid-term drain on the
economy is worth the short-term gain?
10) Mr. Chairman, the Colombia free trade agreement would provide a
huge economic boost for American exporters, like Caterpillar, who the
President is visiting tomorrow, and require absolutely no new
government spending. Why isn’t the FTA in this bill?
###